From owner-freebsd-current Fri Feb 25 10:28:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (GndRsh.dnsmgr.net [198.145.92.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2ADF37BC6F for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:28:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA71012; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:28:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <200002251828.KAA71012@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: dc0 wierdness with Compex Freedomline In-Reply-To: <200002251808.NAA30934@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> from Garrett Wollman at "Feb 25, 2000 01:08:01 pm" To: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:28:15 -0800 (PST) Cc: cwasser@v-wave.com (Chris Wasser), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > < said: > > > I specifically excluded P(coll) by stating point to point or effectively > > point to point via switching. > > Rod, please bother to READ what people write before spewing nonsense. I did read it, and did not spew nonsense. P(coll) is non-sense when talking about maximal. > The original question asked SPECIFICALLY about half-duplex. It also asked about ``maximal'', I solved the equations for maximal, to achive maximal P(coll)=0. > I answered SPECIFICALLY about half-duplex. The duplex does not in any way effect the maximal link layer transmission data rate. You seem to keep forgetting the maximal part... -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message