From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 13 12:07:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8C07D3 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mailch-2.name-services.com (mailch-2.name-services.com [98.124.252.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40A7210B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailch.name-services.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailch.name-services.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C4C362ECE9; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 05:06:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender-Id: 173.88.196.224 Received: from mail-24.name-services.com (sjl0vwsmail09.prod.dm.local [10.7.17.59]) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/4.8.23); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:06:59 GMT X-Pool-Id: 3 Received: from [10.0.10.1] (cpe-173-88-196-224.neo.res.rr.com [173.88.196.224]) by mail-24.name-services.com with SMTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 05:06:51 -0700 Message-ID: <520A215C.4040301@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:06:52 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terje Elde Subject: Re: sysvipc only for one jail References: <20130811173341.6d1cb2e7@arsenic> <20130811173630.24ed528c@arsenic> <25DF7BAC-14CC-4481-BAC1-0DBBF0E0D92C@elde.net> In-Reply-To: <25DF7BAC-14CC-4481-BAC1-0DBBF0E0D92C@elde.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: David Demelier , Maciej Suszko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:07:04 -0000 Terje Elde wrote: > On 12. aug. 2013, at 19.46, Trond Endrestøl wrote: >> If you start the jail manually using jail(8), then /etc/jail.conf >> comes into play, whereas the lines in /etc/rc.conf is used during >> automatic startup of the jails when the host is rebooted. The whole >> arrangement seems unnecessary redundant, and I truly wish this can be >> merged sooner rather than later. > > It *is* unnecessary redundant. > > If you're using /etc/rc.conf to define the jails, then start them with: > > /etc/rc.d/jail start jailname > > That is, if you're mostly using /etc/rc.conf to define the jails, then start them manually using that as well? > > Problem solved? > > Terje > Here is a writeup about jails that you may find useful. It includes a boot time jail startup script for jail(8) defined jails. http://www.a1poweruser.com/35.00-Jails_guide_article.php