From owner-freebsd-arch Thu May 2 20:45:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1B637B404; Thu, 2 May 2002 20:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g433f8605289; Thu, 2 May 2002 21:41:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g433esr05976; Thu, 2 May 2002 21:40:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 21:40:36 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20020502.214036.88733477.imp@village.org> To: jhb@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk, tlambert2@mindspring.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: savcore dump names? From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <4331.1020375723@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message: John Baldwin writes: : IMO, it is unacceptable to come in and break stuff and then say it's : not your problem to fix it. I'd tend to agree you and terry on this. If this work can't be capped off such that people can use it, then it should be backed out. From the rest of the thread, it looks like there are two complaints here? One that the dump names are now insane, and two that it doesn't work on some systems (eg you can't take a kernel dump on alpha). Is that correct, or am I missing something? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message