From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 1 01:23:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014AA16A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 01:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.b0rken.org (beastie.b0rken.org [213.48.48.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BB3443D45 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 01:23:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jason-freebsdlists@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 65027 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Jun 2004 08:23:07 -0000 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 09:23:07 +0100 From: Jason Mann To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040601082307.GI40848@beastie.b0rken.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org References: <20040530024914.A70602@newtrinity.zeist.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040530024914.A70602@newtrinity.zeist.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: hme(4) issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 08:23:15 -0000 On 20040530 0249, Marius Strobl wrote: > As for 2) I didn't manage to reproduce this and I have no idea what could > cause it. Could those of you who experience this please update to the > latest -current containing the above mentioned revisions, remove whatever > workaround you have (e.g. forcing half-duplex) and test if it still is an > issue? Does anyone see this also with other NICs (e.g. dc(4), fxp(4), > gem(4) or xl(4)) or in another situation than described above (e.g. also > in half-duplex mode)? Hi Marius. When I had this problem, it was manifested in BIND and ntpd being unable listen on UDP ports. To get around the problem, I added an fxp card to the system (an Ultra 5). The problem did not occur with the fxp card. Regards, Jason