From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Jul 10 08:17:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6185F102F3A0; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 08:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD44C88CD2; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 08:17:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id w6A8HnKf015331 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 01:17:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132] claimed to be yv.noip.me Reply-To: yuri@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r474299 - head/science/openstructure To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201807091948.w69JmiWo020254@repo.freebsd.org> <20180709224019.4gratkno5k4uzrep@atuin.in.mat.cc> <5138c319-7878-61c9-8a70-6ef3954136f2@freebsd.org> <20180710073800.cfw7k3xgqbwv7lpn@atuin.in.mat.cc> From: Yuri Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 01:17:48 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180710073800.cfw7k3xgqbwv7lpn@atuin.in.mat.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 08:17:51 -0000 On 07/10/18 00:38, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > That answer is nice, but it has nothing to do with my question. Let me > repeat. Why did you not use USE_GITLAB? Is there a problem with it for > this instance? Sorry, I misread your original question, I read 'USE_GITHUB'. -) I didn't know about USE_GITLAB. Will use it with the next update, thanks! Yuri