From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 23 09:22:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F8716A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:22:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E7243D5C for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:22:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j1N9MSb90126; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:22:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "markzero" , Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:22:28 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050223013159.GB61124@logik.ath.cx> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Subject: RE: DSL modem recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:22:30 -0000 What is your DSL provider, what telephone company are they using? Are you running bridged or ppp mode DSL? DSL modems all use proprietary implementations of the DMT protocol, while many will interoperate with different DSL providers and DSLAMS, not all will. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of markzero > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:32 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: DSL modem recommendation > > > Hello, > > Could anybody recommend a good, solid DSL modem that is > supported nicely > by FreeBSD? An internal modem would be preferred but I would consider > otherwise. My main requirements are stability and a lack of any kind of > external management (I want my box to be solely in control, not a > proprietary web or telnet interface). > > I have suffered for far too long with an awful DSL router/firewall that > goes down at the slightest provocation and offers no real > authentication! > > Cheers, > Mark > > -- > PGP: http://www.darklogik.org/pub/pgp/pgp.txt > B776 43DC 8A5D EAF9 2126 9A67 A7DA 390F DEFF 9DD1 >