From owner-freebsd-security Fri Apr 21 9: 5:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from attrition.dynamine.net (dnai-216-15-97-113.cust.dnai.com [216.15.97.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E5137B618; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 09:05:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from otterley@attrition.dynamine.net) Received: from localhost (otterley@localhost) by attrition.dynamine.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03023; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:14:51 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:14:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Otterley To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: Robert Watson , Kris Kennaway , "Michael S. Fischer" , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fw: Re: imapd4r1 v12.264 (fwd) In-Reply-To: <200004191557.e3JFvdX00892@cwsys.cwsent.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > In message >, Robe > rt Watson writes: > > Given that attitude of the developer, I would strongly recommend we mark > > the port as FORBIDDEN, and would also seriously consider any suggestion to > > simply drop it from the ports and packages collections. > > Let me second that opinion. I'd prefer just dropping it from ports > collection. No! Please no! Unless you can offer a viable alternative (NOT Cyrus, thank you very much), please do not remove it. I'd much prefer a patch. --Michael To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message