From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 1 02:52:42 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id CAA21023 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 02:52:42 -0800 Received: from soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.43.52]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA21017 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 02:52:39 -0800 Received: (dim@localhost) by soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.10/PHILMAIL-1.11) id CAA10073 for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 02:52:35 -0800 Date: Wed, 1 Mar 1995 02:52:35 -0800 From: "D. Gerasimatos" Message-Id: <199503011052.CAA10073@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> To: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Questions (mostly upgrading from 1.1.5.1) Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk First two questions are simple: 1) Where can I find mosaic binaries for 1.1.5.1 or even 2.0-2.1? I haven't seen any in ages (but I have one for 1.1.5.1, acquired long ago). 2) How about netscape? Their generic386bsd binary does not want to run on my system. The next pertains to upgrading from 1.1.5.1 to 2.0: I have been happily running FreeBSD 1.1.5.1 for about 6 months now. I have a fairly mature system, and I am loathe to change, but the lack of shared memory and FIFO support is killing me [I understand shared memory is possible, but I never figured it out; the FIFO stuff was incomplete however, even if I compiled my kernel with the FIFO option]. So, I'm thinking about upgrading. My questions are: 1) Should I go to 2.0-R or wait for 2.1 to stabilize or what? 2) Does 2.0-R have built in support for the NCR SCSI controller? I added this in myself last time, including several options. 3) Will I still be able to run my 1.1.5.1 binaries? I have a LOT of them. 4) Is there a FAQ or something that addresses upgrading and how to do it? I'm not even sure which distributions I'll need. I'm not even sure if I can upgrade directly or not... 5) Assuming I can upgrade, how much of my old filesystem do I need to save, and need it all be renamed, in order for 1.1.5.1 binaries to coexist with the newer (entirely new) version of the OS? Will 1.1.5.1 libs and binaries need to be kept separately from the new stuff? Sorry I have so many questons, but I am paranoid about trashing my filesystem or introducing too many bugs with a new kernel. I have been very pleased with the OS, and it is too useful for me to trash (not to mention the work I put into getting things "together"). I haven't seen any real documentation except for installing from scratch, and I _really_ hope that's not my only option. Thanks for any and all help! Keep up the good work! Dimitrios Gerasimatos 2) Does 2.0_R 2) Does 2.0_R