Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:05:58 +0100 From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys socket.h src/sys/kern sys_generic.c uipc_socket.c uipc_syscalls.c Message-ID: <200206202105.58476.dfr@nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20020620185711.GC74849@elvis.mu.org> References: <200206201852.g5KIqtR45478@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020620185711.GC74849@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 20 June 2002 7:57 pm, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> [020620 11:53] wrote: > > alfred 2002/06/20 11:52:54 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > sys/sys socket.h > > sys/kern sys_generic.c uipc_socket.c > > uipc_syscalls.c > > Log: > > Implement SO_NOSIGPIPE option for sockets. This allows one to requ= est > > that an EPIPE error return not generate SIGPIPE on sockets. > > > > Submitted by: lioux > > Inspired by: Darwin > > Can I get some votes (in private mail please) for MFC'ing this feature? I doubt that voting is a useful procedure for this. This appears to simpl= y add=20 a new interface and not change any existing programs. As such, it should = just=20 get the usual settling-out time in current and be MFC'ed afterwards. I=20 suggest waiting a week for any adverse effects and then just do it. --=20 Doug Rabson=09=09=09=09Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com =09=09=09=09=09Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206202105.58476.dfr>