From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 13:20:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B7AB5A for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B732917 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F278E4E62A; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:20:41 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA79C75932; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:20:41 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 770477591E; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:20:41 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:20:34 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20140603.222034.170926258.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <14929937-3701-4A6C-8551-39AC6B377E6A@christianserving.org> References: <20140603.215915.206199362.yasu@utahime.org> <14929937-3701-4A6C-8551-39AC6B377E6A@christianserving.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:20:43 -0000 From: Jim Riggs Subject: Re: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:15:50 -0500 > Yes, we are seeing the same thing, but a single cleanup doesn't always work for us. Sometimes we have to go through several svn up-cleanup-up-cleanup-... iterations to get an up-to-date ports tree. See this thread also: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-May/092269.html Thank you for quick reply. I'll check it. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA