From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 12:43:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172E716A426 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:43:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9824743D53 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:43:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IWW00JYH3CPAV70@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:43:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([213.187.181.70]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IWW002DY3CP3170@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:43:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:43:41 +0200 From: Vaaf In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20060329042321.077eb988@antimatter.net> To: Glenn Dawson , Joseph Vella , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060329144249.023b8728@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <200603281234.11850.satyam@sklinks.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060329141021.023e9af8@broadpark.no> <7.0.1.0.2.20060329042321.077eb988@antimatter.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Why are so many people using 4.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:43:41 -0000 > >Your analogy is horribly flawed. > >The fact that something has been around for a while and is still in >widespread use, speaks very much to it's strengths, and very little >to it's weaknesses. It's not like anybody has a choice, now is it. Try to look at the development from a natural, outside perspective. If stuff ain't right from the start, things will work out in the wrong direction. Ofcourse it won't be noticable at first.