From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Sep 16 06:47:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA13170 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 06:47:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA13165 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 06:47:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA06294; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 15:47:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id PAA28293; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 15:47:12 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980916154712.01723@follo.net> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 15:47:12 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: Hallam Oaks P/L list account , "freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: 'struct isa_device' advice sought References: <199809161224.WAA22191@mail.aussie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <199809161224.WAA22191@mail.aussie.org>; from Hallam Oaks P/L list account on Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 10:24:39PM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 10:24:39PM +1000, Hallam Oaks P/L list account wrote: > My question is this : is the concept of a PCI card masquerading (in > a limited sense) as an ISA one a legitimate approach ? Is it likely > to cause problems ? I know it's a kludge but the alternative is > also not particularly desirable. The alternative is particularly desireable, and I hope to get time to fix it Real Soon Now. It is also necessary to be able to get a clean integration of the PnP code (which I have a hacky intergration of now). Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message