From owner-freebsd-net Mon Feb 18 23: 0:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from sln01.megadat.com (exchange.megadat.com [195.22.224.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68E537B405 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:00:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by sln01.megadat.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <15X2TRFD>; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:00:49 +0200 Message-ID: <8E9035BABCA0514EB0E574B6A7082FC305319C@sln01.megadat.com> From: Girnet Vladimir To: "'net@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: network buffer problem Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:00:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:rizzo@icir.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:38 AM > To: Girnet Vladimir > Cc: 'net@freebsd.org' > Subject: Re: network buffer problem > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 08:21:01AM +0200, Girnet Vladimir wrote: > > > > I found, that NO_MATTER what type of interface do you use > on FreeBSD 4.5R. > > When DUMMYNET is enabled, and use some pipe rulez, ping > with packets more > > than 4096 always got > > ping: sendto: No buffer space available > > The "always" part is false. It depends on how the pipes are > configured. > Please show us your rules. > > luigi > OK, I use such rulez: ipfw pipe 10 config bw 33600bit/s queue 5K ipfw pipe 11 config bw 64Kbit/s queue 10K ipfw pipe 12 config bw 128Kbit/s queue 15K and, the rule - ipfw add 500 pipe XX ip from any to a.b.c.d/e via fxp0 out after issue "ping -s 8192 a.b.c.d" , I got one reply and one ping: sendto: No buffer space available. VG To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message