From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 6 09:22:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC4716A41F; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 09:22:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.113.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C2E43D48; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 09:22:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id 8917A11B07; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 11:22:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 11:22:33 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20050806092232.GA850@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <42F47C0D.2020704@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42F47C0D.2020704@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:22:36 -0000 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005.08.06 01:59:57 -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > Portsnap keeps a compressed snapshot of the ports tree, requiring > roughly 50MB and 13000 inodes. The "natural" place for this to go > would be in /var/db/, but I suspect that this would cause problems > for many users, particularly when it comes to the number of inodes. >=20 > Is this a reasonable excuse for violating hier(7) and putting the > compressed snapshot into /usr/portsnap? For reference, the port keeps > the snapshot in /usr/local/portsnap. Wouldn't it make sense to put in on /var, and if people do not have enough space there, they can just symlink the portsnap directory to a location that has enough space? --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC9IFYh9pcDSc1mlERAlxeAKCYtZBfomQibSPqvsQvqn3ajZpAhQCfd1tJ sDcRwodITmmz/DQSCsujY60= =Rz/x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx--