Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Apr 1999 12:41:04 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Stan Brown" <stanb@awod.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List)
Subject:   suid bit for apm and xbatt
Message-ID:  <19990419172125.0C3B1152B5@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
	How come xbatt is suid, and apm is not? I would think that they both
	should be so that a non-privleged user can obtain battery status from
	the command line.

	Or am i missing something here?

-- 
Stan Brown     stanb@netcom.com                                    843-745-3154
Westvaco
Charleston SC.
-- 
Windows 98: n.
	useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and
	a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
	originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit 
	company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
-
(c) 1999 Stan Brown.  Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990419172125.0C3B1152B5>