Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 23:18:16 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, julian@whistle.com Subject: Re: Threads goals version II Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910312317180.29073-100000@picnic.mat.net> In-Reply-To: <199911010413.VAA15024@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Nate Williams wrote: > > > 6/ (contentious) multiple theads should be bound to within the resource > > > limits of the single process. > > > > Multiple processes/LWPs should be allowed to have their own quantum and > > not count towards the [parent] process quantum, right? > > As I read that, no. A multi-threaded process shouldn't be given any > more 'resources' than a single-threaded process. With the notable exception that a multithreaded process must be able to be concurrently running on multiple processors simpultaneously, right? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include C programming, Electronics, 213 Lakeside Dr. Apt. T-1 | communications, and signal processing. Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run picnic.mat.net: FreeBSD-current(i386) and (301) 220-2114 | jaunt.mat.net : FreeBSD-current(Alpha) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910312317180.29073-100000>