Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:05:42 +0200 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228808 - head/sys/cam/scsi Message-ID: <4EF38D96.3040601@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EF3890B.6020408@FreeBSD.org> References: <201112221640.pBMGeZod025237@svn.freebsd.org> <4EF375E5.2010809@FreeBSD.org> <4EF387F4.9050008@FreeBSD.org> <4EF3890B.6020408@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22.12.2011 21:46, Andriy Gapon wrote: > BTW, acd(4) ... not sure which tense I should use here ... used to create > individual devices for each track - e.g. acd0t1, acd0t2 - where each track could > have its own properties. Yes, I know. But that's a bigger blood, and I am not sure we need it. I am not sure that this approach is correct for data tracks, as up to my present understanding, later data tracks may address data on previous ones, so they can not reside on different devices. For audio tracks it could be more useful, but do you know applications using this? -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF38D96.3040601>