From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 14:16:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D0E16A4CE; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ran.psg.com (ip166.usw253.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com [209.20.253.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D4743D31; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:16:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ran.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AyIBS-0001Pw-6N; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:16:14 -0800 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:16:13 -0800 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <4043B6BA.B847F081@freebsd.org> <200403011507.52238.wes@softweyr.com> <20040302031625.GA4061@scylla.towardex.com> <20040302042957.GH3841@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040302082625.GE22985@cell.sick.ru> <20040302084321.GA21729@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040302085556.GA23734@cell.sick.ru> <20040302092825.GD884@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040302095134.GA24078@cell.sick.ru> <40449B8E.A48B39B0@freebsd.org> <20040302160902.GB26977@cell.sick.ru> Message-Id: <20040302221619.24D4743D31@mx1.FreeBSD.org> cc: Wes Peters cc: Kris Kennaway cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Andre Oppermann cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 22:16:19 -0000 > I do not insist that AS pathes in kernel are good idea. If you > show me an other way to get AS information when constructing > netflow exports in kernel, I'd be thankful. do we need to rediscover why flow export places a large processor burden on criscos, junipers, prockets, ...? randy