From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 8 05:29:48 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA23329 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 05:29:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA23324 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 05:29:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA97174; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 14:29:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: lh@aus.org Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS release tages for 3.0 anomaly References: <199901070529.AAA14795@ayukawa.aus.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 08 Jan 1999 14:29:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: Luke's message of "Thu, 07 Jan 1999 00:47:53 -0500 (EST)" Message-ID: Lines: 10 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Luke writes: > I was wondering how come in the src tree theres a > RELENG_3_0_0_RELEASE tag for cvs, then in the ports tree theres > RELEASE_3_0_0 ? Is it on purpose? Histerical raisins. Besides, the ports tree isn't branched. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message