From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 2 22:35:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38792106564A; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6088160F83; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 22:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4ED952AF.3060404@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:35:27 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Devin Teske References: <039201ccb0ab$b3db9470$1b92bd50$@fisglobal.com> <4ED862D6.9090807@FreeBSD.org> <039f01ccb0da$67b50f20$371f2d60$@fisglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <039f01ccb0da$67b50f20$371f2d60$@fisglobal.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, 'Ken Smith' , 'Parker-Smith' , phk@freebsd.org, 'Julian Elischer' , Dave@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mount(8) bug? rc.d/mountlate bug? bug in both? X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:35:28 -0000 On 12/02/2011 02:08, Devin Teske wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Doug Barton [mailto:dougb@FreeBSD.org] >> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 9:32 PM >> To: Devin Teske >> Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org; Ken Smith; Parker-Smith; Dave@FreeBSD.ORG; >> phk@freebsd.org; 'Julian Elischer' >> Subject: Re: mount(8) bug? rc.d/mountlate bug? bug in both? >> >> Short answer, tag the mount(s) noauto in fstab, and mount them in > /etc/rc.local. >> > > That may be the simplest approach. > > However, we're looking more for a solution that involves keeping the NFS mounts > in fstab(5). Why said anything about moving the NFS mounts out of fstab? Did you actually ready what I wrote? Not to mention, you specifically asked for a solution that involved no code changes. Now you're proposing code changes. > I propose the following [UNTESTED] patch, which tries to make remote-errors > non-fatal to a filesystem marked as "bg". I would not be supportive of such a modification. An error is an error, and needs to be flagged as such. -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/