From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 22 03:37:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B9016A4CE for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 03:37:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns4.nukezone.com (ns4.nukezone.com [207.44.152.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDC843D3F for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 03:37:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org) X-ClientAddr: 127.0.0.1 Received: from nbritton.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by ns4.nukezone.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0M3SrX25188; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:28:53 -0600 Received: from 208.247.248.8 (SquirrelMail authenticated user freebsd@nbritton.org) by www.nbritton.org with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:28:53 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <51181.208.247.248.8.1106364533.squirrel@www.nbritton.org> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:28:53 -0600 (CST) From: To: In-Reply-To: References: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: freebsd@nbritton.org cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rework of the FreeBSD website[was:FreeBSD'sVisualIdentity:Outdated?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 03:37:20 -0000 > > On Jan 21, 2005, at 11:55 PM, wrote: > >>> On Jan 21, 2005, at 4:16 PM, Nikolas Britton wrote: >>> >>>> 1. Can anyone else see the Æ (AE) symbols where the registered >>>> trademark symbols should be, UNIX and MS-DOS? >>> >>> This was just an error in my mockups - it is not an issue with the >>> patch. I now fixed it in the mockups, too. >> >> Yes you did fix it but it's still the wrong mark. > > I changed it. > > Chris Thats more better :-)... sorry I guess I'm just nit-picking, It's only a mockup site after all, but it is legally important to get these little details correct. We don't want to give ammunition to someone that might want to shoot us in the foot, even if there just 0.177 Cal. BBs. here is one more link about Trade and Service Marks: http://www.explorit.com/tmsmandwhicd.html Anyways, Thank you for all the work you've done, I hope your proposed changes are implemented... Ok back to learning about LDAP, later.