From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Jan 17 01:15:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA28065
          for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 01:15:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA28060
          for <bugs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 01:15:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA13559; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 01:09:14 -0800
To: Thomas Graichen <graichen@omega.physik.fu-berlin.de>
cc: federero@obelix.cica.es (Jose Federero Martinez), bugs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: your mail 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Jan 1996 22:49:30 +0100."
             <199601162149.WAA02809@prospero> 
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 01:09:13 -0800
Message-ID: <13557.821869753@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> is this a joke or truth - can somebody send such a perfect bug-report
> ? - we should adapt our send-pr a bit :-) - if it is meant as it
> stands here (i.e. the truth and no joke) - someone _must_ find a

Funny you should say that, because I read the whole bug report myself
and sort of sat back thinking "My!  That has to be the most COMPLETE
bug report I have ever seen!  If only all of them looked that way!
Who is this guy?  Maybe we should help him!" :-)

Then I saw that Nate had already replied with what looked to be a very
plausible suggestion, so I didn't have to.

Yes, Jesus, we will indeed do our best to help you with this problem!
Such thoroughness in a bug report should not, after all, go
unrewarded! :)

					Jordan