Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:26:56 +0200 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OpenPAM Figwort broke PAM modules from ports Message-ID: <1119900416.27663.15.camel@cream.xbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050627191205.GT1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050626211011.GH1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <86d5q8113a.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050627130449.GQ1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <42C0026C.3040000@FreeBSD.org> <20050627191205.GT1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Lundi 27 juin 2005 à 21:12 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen a écrit : > Hi Florent :), > > > > With all respect I owe you you, the last upgrade of my -CURRENT box > > > constrained me to use the following patch to make pam_alreadyloggedin.so > > > work again : > > > > FWIW, I always needed to put full pathname for pam_ldap to use > > it. > > If you didn't upgraded to a too recent -CURRENT yet (ie. you still have > OpenPAM Feterita release), you should try removing the full path if > pam_ldap.so is located in /usr/local/lib/. If your -CURRENT is too > recent, please, try to patch src/contrib/openpam/lib/openpam_dynamic.c > with the quick hack I posted earlier. Recompile it and install it > from src/lib/libpam/libpam/ and then remove the full path of > pam_ldap in /etc/pam.d/login. Try to log from a text console (this > doesn't need to reboot). You should see either an error message stating > that pam_ldap.so couldn't be found or a successful login attempt in > /var/log/auth.log. > > I would be glad if you were able to bring your testimony : I would > really like to see a note in src/UPDATING for this, since FreeBSD 6 > is going to be out in less than 2 months, and not informing users > about this behaviour change would break PITA, IMO. Well, I just tried again without full path and it seems to just work on this RELENG_5 box. I guess an UPDATING entry wouldn't hurt if we just recommend people to check if they're using absolute paths or not. Just my 2 cents. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1119900416.27663.15.camel>