From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  7 23:34:29 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C6816A46C;
	Thu,  7 Feb 2008 23:34:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C1013C45B;
	Thu,  7 Feb 2008 23:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m17NU7PS093277;
	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:30:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:32:51 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20080207.163251.179960372.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: dougb@freebsd.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <47AABEEF.7020807@FreeBSD.org>
References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080207071314.GO99258@elvis.mu.org>
	<47AABEEF.7020807@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: attilio@freebsd.org, yar@freebsd.org, swhetzel@gmail.com, jeff@freebsd.org,
	alfred@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:34:29 -0000

In message: <47AABEEF.7020807@FreeBSD.org>
            Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> writes:
: Alfred Perlstein wrote:
: 
: > Maybe a nicer way of saying/asking would be to ask:
: > 
: > Is the FUSE replacement going to be tested to the point where it's
: > better than then current NTFS code?
: 
: Given that the current NTFS code in the base panics within minutes of 
: any kind of serious access, and has the ability to take the other 
: filesystems down with it (including UFS2) that won't be hard.

This change in behavior is very recent.  It used to be the one file
system you could count on to get data off a disk that was throwing
disk errors back at the OS.

Warner