From owner-freebsd-current Sat Oct 19 14:57:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F58037B406 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6735943E8A for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:57:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 61832 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2002 21:57:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lucifer.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.2) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2002 21:57:51 -0000 Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 23:57:37 +0200 From: Clement Laforet To: Kris Kennaway Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, kris@obsecurity.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New 5.0 ports uploaded Message-Id: <20021019235737.2e1987e9.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20021019205848.GB7186@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20021019012219.GA86396@xor.obsecurity.org> <20021019051918.GC14922@vega.vega.com> <20021019205848.GB7186@xor.obsecurity.org> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.7) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:58:48 -0700 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Sorry, my statement wasn't clear. I'll be doing something of the form > > .if ${OSVERSION} > 500000 > BROKEN= "Does not compile on FreeBSD 5.x" > .endif > > This will not affect users of 4.x > Is there a "correct" way to name patches dedicated to 5.x ? clem To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message