Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:00:05 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Uptime [OT] Message-ID: <20120615160005.GB20814@hemlock.hydra> In-Reply-To: <201206151249.q5FCnnKF019002@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <op.wfxecjm234t2sn@cr48.lan> <201206151249.q5FCnnKF019002@mail.r-bonomi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 07:49:49AM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote: > > Heh. check out -this- one: > > % uname -a > ****** ******************** *** **** ****** *** Kernel #0: Thu Mar 20 16:40:01 CST 1997 ************************:/usr/src/sys/compile/LOCAL i386 > > The build date _is_ accurate, the hardware it's running on is old enough to > vote. <wry grin> > > It's publicly accessible on the Internet, > > It's not quite as ridiculous as it looks, the (limited) apps running on it > _are_ up-to-date. > > Uptime is nothing to brag about -- no UPS, combined with 'unreliable' public > utility power, does have an impact. No power conditioning (implied by no UPS) is nothing to brag about. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120615160005.GB20814>