From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Apr 19 14: 4: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7CA15692 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:03:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA03289; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 18:00:01 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199904192100.SAA03289@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: NTFS In-Reply-To: from Ustimenko Semen at "Apr 19, 1999 9: 7:47 pm" To: semen@iclub.nsu.ru (Ustimenko Semen) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 18:00:01 -0300 (EST) Cc: dkelly@hiwaay.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG #define quoting(Ustimenko Semen) // > NTFS under FreeBSD is still read-only, right? // > // // It is possible to write, if we doesn't change size, name and etc. // And if file doesn't have any 'holes', and is not compressed. // // Writing assume that you will use it like swap file, that's all. How would you evaluate performance and stability in doing so ? I've tried using swap files (vnode) over msdos partition, but the performance made it unusable. Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@jonny.eng.br To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message