From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Jan 10 18:21:14 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA16846
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:21:14 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA16841
          for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:21:12 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from sprice@hiwaay.net)
Received: from localhost (sprice@localhost)
	by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with SMTP id UAA27751;
	Sun, 10 Jan 1999 20:20:36 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 20:20:36 -0600 (CST)
From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
To: Mike Meyer <mwm@phone.net>
cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/9422
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901101802180.9536-100000@guru.phone.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.02.9901102012370.18505-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Mike Meyer wrote:

# /usr/ports/package/All doesn't seem to exist on my system

Argh, should have been /usr/ports/packages/All.

# (3.0-RELEASE). Should "make package" install the package in that
# directory by default, and my not having it is creating the problem?

'make package' does install there by default if you manually
create the directory, but this isn't the problem.  You would
still need to use PKG_PATH because pkg_add must have either
the full path to the package file (eg. /tmp/foo/foo-1.2.tgz)
or you need to set PKG_PATH to the package directory and use
the package name (foo-1.2 without the .tgz).

-steve


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message