Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:22:39 +0200 From: Ingolf Koch <ingolf@jellonet.de> To: Paul Herman <pherman@frenchfries.net> Cc: Ingolf Koch <ingolf@jellonet.de>, freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG, netbsd-help@netbsd.org Subject: Re: i4b on NetBSD_1.5ALPHA2/i386: strange traffic Message-ID: <20000828002239.A24772@maus.local.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008271454100.318-100000@bagabeedaboo.security.at12.de>; from pherman@frenchfries.net on Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 03:01:37PM %2B0200 References: <20000825235540.A22243@maus.local.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008271454100.318-100000@bagabeedaboo.security.at12.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 03:01:37PM +0200, Paul Herman wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your investigation. I'll try to convince
> > my ISP that the LCP ECHO_REQUESTs are not necessary.
>
> Sorry to step in late on this thread, but there are indeed patches on
> the freebsd-isdn mailing list by myself and improved by Gary Jennejohn
> which correct this.
>
> I also personaly believe that LCP ECHO_REQUESTS are not the most
> useful thing on the planet, but being a standard, it is your ISPs
> perogative to use them, and it is the client's job to support them.
Well, they *are* supported -- at least, a correct reply is
generated for each request. The problem is/was that both
the request and the reply seem to count as traffic...
Ingolf
--
Ingolf Koch ICQ#60829470 Beste Kneipe in Jena-Ost
PGP: 0x7B3B5661 213C 828E 0C92 16B5 05D0 4D5B A324 EC04
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000828002239.A24772>