From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Apr  5 06:44:01 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA18968
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 5 Apr 1998 06:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA18945
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 5 Apr 1998 06:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id OAA00493; Sun, 5 Apr 1998 14:11:23 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199804051211.OAA00493@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: Softupdate for 2.2.6?
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 14:11:23 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: frank@our.domaintje.com, tcobb@staff.circle.net,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <3370.891777350@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Apr 5, 98 04:55:31 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> No implication of centralized control over third party patches was

I should have specified that mine was meant only as a clarification
to other people.

	cheers
	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message