From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Sep 12 16:09:56 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA10663 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clem.systemsix.com (clem.systemsix.com [198.99.86.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA10655 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clem.systemsix.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA20140; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 17:07:31 -0600 Message-Id: <199609122307.RAA20140@clem.systemsix.com> X-Authentication-Warning: clem.systemsix.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 From: Steve Passe To: Terry Lambert cc: erich@uruk.org, smp@csn.net, peter@spinner.dialix.com, rv@groa.uct.ac.za, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (long) Intel SMP info (was -> Re: Intel XXpress - some SMP benchmarks) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Sep 1996 14:51:41 PDT." <199609122151.OAA07647@phaeton.artisoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 17:07:30 -0600 Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, >> No. The rules are: >> >> "default configuration": >> CPUs must be numbered consecutively starting with 0, in any order. > >The XXPRESS fails this, then, since it goes 0, 2 (not 0, 1). it isn't a 'default' configuration as it contains a complete MP table describing its configuration. (not to say that the XXPRESS doesn't "fail", the jury is still out on that issue!) -- Steve Passe | powered by smp@csn.net | FreeBSD -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAzHe7tEAAAEEAM274wAEEdP+grIrV6UtBt54FB5ufifFRA5ujzflrvlF8aoE 04it5BsUPFi3jJLfvOQeydbegexspPXL6kUejYt2OeptHuroIVW5+y2M2naTwqtX WVGeBP6s2q/fPPAS+g+sNZCpVBTbuinKa/C4Q6HJ++M9AyzIq5EuvO0a8Rr9AAUR tBlTdGV2ZSBQYXNzZSA8c21wQGNzbi5uZXQ+ =ds99 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----