Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:18:09 -0500 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: NAKAJI Hiroyuki <nakaji@jp.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: non working DRI on *i386* RADEONX1650+FreeBSD7-stable+Xorg7.4 Message-ID: <1234113489.66799.3.camel@ferret.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <86eiy9qhn2.fsf@ra333.heimat.gr.jp> References: <20090207.071848.193785503.chat95@mac.com> <20090207.072411.71183618.chat95@mac.com> <1234026184.1562.47.camel@ferret.2hip.net> <86iqnlss4b.fsf@ra333.heimat.gr.jp> <1234081486.1562.74.camel@ferret.2hip.net> <86eiy9qhn2.fsf@ra333.heimat.gr.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 20:42 +0900, NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote: > Thanks, Robert. I'm now clear. > > >>>>> In <1234081486.1562.74.camel@ferret.2hip.net> > >>>>> Robert Noland <rnoland@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > 2. Do we need to update the userland, too? > > > This depends on whether or not any specific API/ABI has been broken. > > Normally this should only be observed if shared library versions change. > > The above portmanager usage will just deal with it, even if > > PORTREVISIONS aren't bumped, though we attempt to bump all needed ports. > > I updated kernel and userland to 7.1-STABLE anyway. > > # uname -a > FreeBSD ML115.heimat.gr.jp 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #21: Sun Feb 8 09:49:36 JST 2009 root@ML115.heimat.gr.jp:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ML115 amd64 > > > > 3. If using portupgrade, is "portupgrade -af" better than > > > "portupgrade -rf xorg"? > > > I haven't used portupgrade in a long time, so I'm not the best person to > > answer this. The primary concern is ensuring that all the needed ports > > are updated in dependency order. Unless I'm mistaken, portupgrade -rf > > xorg is not what you want, as that would try to rebuild everything that > > depends on the xorg meta port, which is pretty much nothing. > > Oh, my typo. It should be "portupgrade -fR". > > I choosed, then, "make -DALWAYS_BUILD_DEPENDS -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER > install" in x11/xorg. And things seems going well except xfce4, which is > another problem. This is also a little dangerous. Old packages will not be deinstalled, so you overwrite the existing files with new ones, but you don't clean up files that might have gone away in the new port. Old header files or libraries may be left abandoned. robert. -- Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> FreeBSD [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkmPE9EACgkQM4TrQ4qfROMGeACePjQfVAnoHPrtyVqykufCrvY0 PHEAn35POay2skRmfRb/7Uptfs5boNeJ =FULk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1234113489.66799.3.camel>