Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:45:22 -0500 From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x11/kde4-runtime Message-ID: <20130208164522.12a6f6c7@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-jq4Gjn6CMFMdk219tpAOFMU=RU77WA-2xWgVvEAU_0g@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130208083723.4afe67e6@scorpio> <CADLo83-jq4Gjn6CMFMdk219tpAOFMU=RU77WA-2xWgVvEAU_0g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:19:34 +0000 Chris Rees articulated: > This is symptomatic of the dependency being of the form bash>=version, > rather than simply depending on the bash binary. > > Please would you provide a log? I can't find from a cursory search > the exact port that depends on bash in this way. I have come across several. In order to create a log, I will have to revert to "bash-devel". I reverted to the "bash" port because of the problems I was having. The "x11/kde4-runtime" is one such port however. Both "portupgrade" and "portmaster" bitched about the conflict with "bash". I had the "bash-devel" port installed at the time. I am not sure if it was that actual port or one in the chain though. If I had a test machine available, I would change the "bash" port and then try building the x11/kde4-runtime port. However, since I don't, it will just have to wait. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ The difficult we do today; the impossible takes a little longer.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130208164522.12a6f6c7>