Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 00:10:00 -0500 From: Steve Ames <steve@energistic.com> To: Tillman <tillman@seekingfire.com> Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sparc slowdown - problem identified... Message-ID: <20030816051000.GA68818@energistic.com> In-Reply-To: <20030815223159.F22214@seekingfire.com> References: <20030815121010.I97608@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030815135034.GA701@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030815080055.O22214@seekingfire.com> <20030815143404.GB701@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030815110221.T22214@seekingfire.com> <20030815223159.F22214@seekingfire.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:31:59PM -0600, Tillman wrote: > Any ideas? Is it possible that the hme interfaces are numbered in a > different order with the new kernel, similar to how the disk devices > could have been renumbered (but that wasn't an issue for me)? Dunno if its possible or not but easy enough to check. Do a quick ifconfig on the current kernel and write down the interface and corresponding MAC address. Boot into new kernel and see if anything has changes. -Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030816051000.GA68818>