From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Tue Sep 27 20:48:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4EDC00062 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EDE5E5 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A3470C00061; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F9CC00060 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928415E4 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u8RKmJfh006943 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:48:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213031] lang/ruby22: Segmentation fault during compilation of port Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:48:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: elofu17@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:48:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213031 Bug ID: 213031 Summary: lang/ruby22: Segmentation fault during compilation of port Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ruby@FreeBSD.org Reporter: elofu17@hotmail.com Assignee: ruby@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(ruby@FreeBSD.org) I get a reproduceable error while compiling the ruby-2.2.5,1 port for FreeB= SD 9.3 amd64. Story: Today I installed a new freebsd-builder machine for building ports using poudriere. Host OS on the builder is FreeBSD 10.3 amd64. On this machine I let poudriere create four build jails: 10.3 amd64 10.1 amd64 9.3 amd64 9.3 i386 In all four jails I compile the same list of ports, where lang/ruby22 is on= e of them. The port compiles just fine in three jails, but in the 9.3 amd64 jail, I repeatedly get a "Segmentation fault (core dumped)". Syslog message: 2016-09-27 21:55:24 +02:00 freebsd-builder kernel: pid 71467 (conftest), ui= d 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Here's a snippet from the build logfile: /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/93amd64-default/2016-09-27_21h39m31s/lo= gs/ruby-2.2.5,1.log ... ... checking for timezone... yes checking whether timezone requires zero arguments... no checking for negative time_t for gmtime(3)... yes checking for localtime(3) overflow correctly... no checking whether right shift preserve sign bit... yes checking whether _SC_CLK_TCK is supported... yes checking stack growing direction on amd64... -1 checking for pthread_kill in -lpthread... yes checking for pthread_np.h... yes checking whether pthread_t is scalar type... yes checking for sched_yield... (cached) yes checking for pthread_attr_setinheritsched... yes checking for pthread_attr_get_np... yes checking for pthread_attr_getstack... yes checking for pthread_get_stackaddr_np... no checking for pthread_get_stacksize_np... no checking for thr_stksegment... no checking for pthread_stackseg_np... no checking for pthread_getthrds_np... no checking for pthread_cond_init... (cached) yes checking for pthread_condattr_setclock... yes checking for pthread_condattr_init... yes checking for pthread_sigmask... yes checking for pthread_setname_np... no checking for pthread_getattr_np... no checking for pthread_attr_init... yes checking if mcontext_t is a pointer... no checking for getcontext... yes checking for setcontext... yes checking if fork works with pthread... yes checking whether ELF binaries are produced... yes checking for elf.h... (cached) yes checking elf_abi.h usability... no checking elf_abi.h presence... no checking for elf_abi.h... no checking whether OS depend dynamic link works... yes checking for procstat_open_sysctl in -lprocstat... yes checking for procstat_getvmmap... yes checking execinfo.h usability... yes checking execinfo.h presence... yes checking for execinfo.h... yes checking for backtrace in -lexecinfo... yes checking for unw_backtrace in -lunwind... no checking for backtrace... yes checking for broken backtrace... Segmentation fault (core dumped) <------= ---- yes checking valgrind/memcheck.h usability... no checking valgrind/memcheck.h presence... no checking for valgrind/memcheck.h... no checking for strip... strip checking for __builtin_setjmp... yes with cast () checking for setjmp type... __builtin_setjmp checking for prefix of external symbols... NONE checking pthread.h usability... yes ... ... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=