From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 27 20:11:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.masirv.com (ns1.masirv.com [207.105.128.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 321BA14F8B for ; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:11:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from FloresR@mx3.masirv.com) Received: from ns2.masirv.com (root@ns2 [207.105.129.4]) by ns1.masirv.com (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA27903 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:11:35 -0700 Received: from newman.masirv.com (mx3 [207.105.129.15]) by masirv.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA05256 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:11:33 -0700 Received: by exchange.masirv.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:11:33 -0700 Message-ID: From: Richard Flores To: "'freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: RE: setiathome crashes 3.2? Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:11:32 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG unsubscribe freebsd-hackers end > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas David Rivers [mailto:rivers@dignus.com] > Sent: Sunday, June 27, 1999 7:09 PM > To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: setiathome crashes 3.2? > > > > I seem to recall seeing this someone (this may not be the > right list.) > > But - I downloaded the 3.2 Seti@home and starting running it > on a left-over 75mhz laptop I have. > > It seems to crash the laptop (silently lock it up, actually) > fairly quickly. > > Did I recall someone else mentioning that? > > Would everyone agree that it's not a "good thing" for a user-mode > program to be able to lock up the OS? > > - Dave Rivers - > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message