From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 16:11:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990D916A4E5; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from basement.kutulu.org (pcp03610121pcs.longhl01.md.comcast.net [68.49.239.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D4143FA3; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:11:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kutulu@kutulu.org) Received: from wombat.localnet (wombat.localnet [192.168.69.3]) by basement.kutulu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDE4AD9E; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:11:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by wombat.localnet (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B1D22B82A; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 18:42:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 18:42:39 -0400 From: Michael Edenfield To: "David E. O'Brien" Message-ID: <20030831224239.GA49662@wombat.localnet> Mail-Followup-To: "David E. O'Brien" , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200308310808.h7V88mIT023746@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308310808.h7V88mIT023746@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Accept-Language: en X-PGP-Key: http://www.kutulu.org/pgp/kutulu.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1CE0 3C31 7013 D529 406D 37DC 09CC CD84 A46C 878F User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash1/files patch-af patch-am patch-an patch-ao patch-ap patch-aq patch-ar patch-as patch-at patch-builtins-common.c patch-builtins-common.h patch-error.c patch-error.h patch-print_cmd.c patch-readline-display.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 23:11:54 -0000 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * David E. O'Brien [030831 04:06]: > obrien 2003/08/31 01:08:48 PDT > Log: > Fix build on -current (varargs -> stdarg) > [don't propagate the poorly named patch files from the PR] As the submitter of the PR I'd like to apologize for the poorly named patch files. I was just following the example of all the existing patch files in most of the ports I'd fixed over the weekend. =20 Is is preferred not to name patches patch-aa? And if so why are there so many of those in the ports tree already? Just wanted to know before I go do any more of these. --Mike --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/UnneCczNhKRsh48RAiOjAJ4oXYVpQliKfAg1vZSxUNbMV0vPiQCfZvge Sj9N2P6dAWM5rVDQWFNqXOk= =+p5w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--