From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  2 20:46:39 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCED1065688;
	Tue,  2 Jun 2009 20:46:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EE18FC1D;
	Tue,  2 Jun 2009 20:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 9C68A8C088; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 15:46:38 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:46:38 -0500
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
Message-ID: <20090602204638.GC4425@lonesome.com>
References: <3B3FEBB417C04B77AED8998347C99585@multiplay.co.uk>
	<03083008@serv3.int.kfs.ru> <4A1D7320.2030000@FreeBSD.org>
	<20090527191746.GA8089@lonesome.com> <67308765@bb.ipt.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <67308765@bb.ipt.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 = Fedora 8?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:46:39 -0000

> > > Then mark the port BROKEN, or some such. User confusion is a bad thing. :)
> > s/BROKEN/IGNORE/
> 
> Just wonder, can/should it be implemented automagically via
> the repocopy script?

I have no opinion, but will note that as long as you don't connect
the ports to the category Makefile, you don't need to worry about
things like this :-)

mcl