From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 15:34:14 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B909F3A6
for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 15:34:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A021B66259
for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 15:34:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t02FYEgc035915
for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 15:34:14 GMT
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 196435] Prevent @sample keyword from removing user symlinks
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 15:34:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@vfemail.net
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-196435-13-8EDQxR1uQd@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-196435-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-196435-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 15:34:14 -0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196435
Jan Beich <jbeich@vfemail.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #151209|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #2 from Jan Beich <jbeich@vfemail.net> ---
Created attachment 151216
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151216&action=edit
v2
(In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #1)
> Also, for cmp drop the -h, we want symlinks to be followed, otherwise, it'll
> compare the content of the file with the path of the sample file, which, in
> most cases, won't be the same ;-)
Indeed, I've traded one issue for another:
- symlink target_file vs. regular sample_file (no filetype check)
- symlink target_file vs. symlink sample_file (no symlink path check)
- regular target_file vs. regular sample_file
- regular target_file vs. symlink sample_file
after
- symlink target_file vs. regular sample_file (path vs. content)
- symlink target_file vs. symlink sample_file
- regular target_file vs. regular sample_file
- regular target_file vs. symlink sample_file (path vs. content)
Let's try to assume target_file cannot be a symlink if unmodified by user or
bug 196432 remains closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.