From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 9 10:14:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7580B37B406; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:14:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EA243E6A; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:14:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.3/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g89HEYVo066113 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:14:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.3/8.12.5/Submit) id g89HEXop066110; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:14:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:14:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200209091714.g89HEXop066110@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, kan@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: No way to tell when `long long' is or is not supported? In-Reply-To: <20020909081046.GB26978@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200209090350.g893oHMs062192@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20020909081046.GB26978@dragon.nuxi.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > Looking at GCC on other platforms, "_LONGLONG" seems to be the most > preferred symbol. How does this patch look? Works for me. I'd still like to see `-posix' go away, if we're going to be changing freebsd-spec.h further. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message