From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 19 15:49:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7B98C21; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A432DAB; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (etroy.elischer.org [121.45.232.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s5JFmsBb075861 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:48:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <53A30660.7010605@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:48:48 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Simon J. Gerraty" , Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10 References: <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , Brooks Davis , Warner Losh , freebsd-current Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:49:08 -0000 On 6/18/14, 4:05 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >> Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to >> FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD >> 10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT >> host with bmake? > You would likely need to apply many of the changes made in 10. > IIRC stable/9 has just enough bmake support to be able to build/install > bmake itself, so that ports can use it. > > I'm not sure how many people would appreciate making such changes to > stable/9 at this point. I just populate a jail with 9.0 binaries from the DVD image. > >> I'm trying to build a FreeBSD stable/9 jail on a FreeBSD 10/stable host, so th >> at >> I can build ports inside the jail with poudriere. > Why not use fmake in that scenario? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >