From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 11 12:04:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D181816A4CE; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0B92343D41; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:04:00 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <2004031120035801100lgl3ne>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:03:59 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA93943;
	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:03:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:03:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <36090.1078874197@critter.freebsd.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403111202000.87340-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: small@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: "nanobsd" prototype
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:04:02 -0000



On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>
[...] 
> 	mkdir /usr/src/nanobsd
[...]
> 
> Feedback of all sorts most welcome!  And more documentation
> to arrive as it gets written.

wouldn't it make sense to put nanoBSD in release alongside picoBSD?
(that still leaves us microBSD and milliBSD :-)