Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:09 +0000 From: rb@gid.co.uk To: "Osipov, Michael" <michael.osipov@siemens.com> Cc: "freebsd-java@freebsd.org" <freebsd-java@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Needle in the haystack: same Java code on two identical machines, one passes one fails Message-ID: <CB85C7B3-943B-43A6-989F-CAB0FC04BA92@gid.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <68644224DA0DE64CA5A49838ED219A0425C0F181@DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net> References: <68644224DA0DE64CA5A49838ED219A0425C0F0EA@DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net> <B49D69D5-F3FD-4A44-A416-FADF8CF86C69@gid.co.uk> <68644224DA0DE64CA5A49838ED219A0425C0F181@DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 15:59, Osipov, Michael <michael.osipov@siemens.com> = wrote: >=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >>=20 >>> On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:50, Osipov, Michael = <michael.osipov@siemens.com> >> wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi folks, >>>=20 >>> I am currently experiencing a stdio issue on a FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE = box >> at work where >>> another, identical box, works flawlessly as well as other test boxes = in >> a VM or on real >>> hardware from 9.3-STABLE to 11.0-STABLE. >>>=20 >>> Let's stick to the two identical boxes at work for now, both are two >> identical HPE >>> servers (Xeon CPUs, RAM 4 GiB) running 10.3-STABLE, both base = systems >> are >>> configured the same way. Software from ports installed is slightly >> different. >>>=20 >>> faulty box: >>> FreeBSD blnn719x.ww004.siemens.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE = #0 >> r310805: Fri Dec 30 11:29:53 CET 2016 >> root@blnn719x.ww004.siemens.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLNN719X i386 >>>=20 >>> working box: >>> FreeBSD blnn714x.ww004.siemens.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE = #0 >> r310632: Tue Dec 27 18:58:32 CET 2016 >> root@blnn714x.ww004.siemens.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLNN714X i386 = [etc] >>=20 >> Well at a quick look, there are changes between r310632 and r310805 = that >> might explain what you are seeing. >=20 > Are you certain? I checked both logs and the diff between these two = revisions. > All I see is HyperV changes from Microsoft and a few changes to Intel = NICs. >=20 > Is there anything particular you are pointing at? No, but that=E2=80=99s the only obvious difference between your two = setups so you should at least eliminate that from your enquiries. > Michael >=20 -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CB85C7B3-943B-43A6-989F-CAB0FC04BA92>