From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 10 10:43:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DF21F66 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A1E16F8 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3m64fM4W4CzblV; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:43:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from :date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mail; t=1433932985; x=1435747386; bh=c6tYb9roWJkEjcoZELySG/7sWzvje6Fw93ISruYi8w4=; b= Q4e1I/nuc4bxH9RyMBeZ+0BJjuy4XLj7onel1BWL/pTErmJHmTt202qAt1m/zq9A K8aBrc+uHo8VoMaBWFPkH1/Z5yrDs9b1GhMg4QEouqzibAejIZjkpYfKlfkUx0+e LStDFRdOIURg9nrmDWjWQMs9IeW3sWKVXeD3wzkdkLw= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XBsKJpUVub7K; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:43:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from marvin.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:43:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <557814B9.9010008@madpilot.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:43:05 +0200 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger , Steven Hartland CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1? References: <82E830BE-8B28-479A-8CBE-78D192592E26@FreeBSD.org> <55780401.7050205@multiplay.co.uk> <20150610102345.GN49099@home.opsec.eu> <55781141.2070005@multiplay.co.uk> <20150610103456.GO49099@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20150610103456.GO49099@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:43:12 -0000 On 06/10/15 12:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> You kernel hasn't been rebuilt then. > > Yes, but normally, freebsd-update provides me with an updated kernel. > > The update provides (among other stuff): > > /boot/kernel/zfs.ko > /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols > /lib/libzpool.so.2 > > so it does not touch the value uname reports until a new kernel is built. > > It's surprising, but I can live with that. It's always been like this with binary updates AFAIK. The kernel binary gets updated only if needed. There is the freebsd-version(1) command to get information about the userland version, which should always be equal or bigger than the kernel version. -- Guido Falsi