From owner-freebsd-bluetooth@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 7 19:31:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FB116A403 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@savvis.net) Received: from mailgate1b.savvis.net (mailgate1b.savvis.net [216.91.182.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF4943D76 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:31:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@savvis.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate1b.savvis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AA83BE8A; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:31:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailgate1b.savvis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgate1b.savvis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17859-01-28; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:31:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.12.163.251] (unknown [10.12.163.251]) by mailgate1b.savvis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632F43BE89; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:31:11 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4550DEFE.1030807@savvis.net> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:31:10 -0800 From: Maksim Yevmenkin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060906) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norbert Koch References: <4550A609.6050004@demig.de> In-Reply-To: <4550A609.6050004@demig.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at savvis.net Cc: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MSI BToes 2.0 EDR X-BeenThere: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Using Bluetooth in FreeBSD environments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:31:15 -0000 Norbert, > Can anyone confirm that (or if) the above > mentioned usb to bluetooth-2.0 adaptor works > with 6.x? According to MSI's homepage, the > chip is named MS 0043. well, it _should_ work. 2.0 devices backward compatible with 1.1 stacks. i can not tell you for sure which chip it uses. it could be csr or bcm2045 or may be something else. in any case, there is a very good chance that it will just work. thanks, max