From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 19:51:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FED016A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:51:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from opiate.soulwax.net (CPE0010a702d464-CM000039ae486b.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [63.139.24.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306C943D46 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:51:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chopra@opiate.soulwax.net) Received: by opiate.soulwax.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A19B3405B; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:51:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:51:43 -0500 From: Munish Chopra To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031218035143.GB2107@opiate.soulwax.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20031212104433.GA803@galgenberg.net> <1071237706.970.41.camel@localhost> <20031212165822.GC48271@opiate.soulwax.net> <20031212190956.GA83087@opiate.soulwax.net> <20031217224800.GB41308@xor.obsecurity.org> <20031218031512.GA628@opiate.soulwax.net> <20031218034220.GA2107@opiate.soulwax.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031218034220.GA2107@opiate.soulwax.net> Subject: Re: audio lag in 5.2-Beta (card emu10k1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 03:51:45 -0000 [snip stuff about sound lag] On 2003-12-17 22:42 +0000, Munish Chopra wrote: > > On 2003-12-17 14:48 +0000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > Did you test the patch I posted? I have had no responses about that. > > > > > > > No, must've slipped by during finals like Mathew's patch did. I'm going > > to go hunt the archives for it, but if you could point to it instead > > that'd be great. I'll test it tonight. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Found it quicker than I thought I would. Unfortunately it doesn't change > the situation. I reverted to revision 1.89 of channel.c, 1.20 of > buffer.c, and 1.7 of buffer.h. > > I'll try going back some more if it doesn't give too much trouble and > pinpointing when things broke. I can't even remember when this first > showed up. > Embarrassingly enough another reply to myself, but I didn't think I'd find it this quickly. Reverting to revision 1.88 of channel.c fixed things right up (also 1.20 of buffer.c and 1.7 of buffer.h). No more lag. Revision 1.89 of channel.c attempted to make really short sounds actually play. Looks like buffer issues. -- Munish Chopra