From owner-svn-src-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 07:48:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFBA5AFB; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fer.hr (mail.fer.hr [161.53.72.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.fer.hr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63575A4B; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x23 (161.53.63.210) by MAIL.fer.hr (161.53.72.233) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.342.3; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:48:37 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:48:38 +0100 From: Marko Zec To: Gleb Smirnoff Subject: Re: svn commit: r274921 - projects/routing/sys/net Message-ID: <20141124084838.2af0f2cd@x23> In-Reply-To: <20141124065122.GE47144@FreeBSD.org> References: <201411231747.sANHlC9Y088840@svn.freebsd.org> <20141124065122.GE47144@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [161.53.63.210] Cc: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, "Alexander V. Chernikov" X-BeenThere: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the src " projects" tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:48:47 -0000 On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:51:22 +0300 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 05:47:12PM +0000, Alexander V. Chernikov > wrote: > A> Author: melifaro > A> Date: Sun Nov 23 17:47:12 2014 > A> New Revision: 274921 > A> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/274921 > A> > A> Log: > A> Finish r274335#2: put RT_LOCK_DESTROY() back. > A> > A> Modified: > A> projects/routing/sys/net/route.c > A> > A> Modified: projects/routing/sys/net/route.c > A> ============================================================================== > A> --- projects/routing/sys/net/route.c Sun Nov 23 17:45:49 > A> 2014 (r274920) +++ projects/routing/sys/net/route.c > A> Sun Nov 23 17:47:12 2014 (r274921) @@ -1505,6 +1505,7 @@ > A> rtrequest1_fib(int req, struct rt_addrin if (rn == NULL) { > A> ifa_free(rt->rt_ifa); > A> Free(rt_key(rt)); > A> + RT_LOCK_DESTROY(rt); > A> uma_zfree(V_rtzone, rt); > A> #ifdef FLOWTABLE > A> if (rt0 != NULL) > > Don't know about your branch, but in head RT_LOCK_DESTROY is done > in V_rtzone finit method. So you are going to hit destroying of > already destroyed mutex. > > btw, I see no good reason for virtualizing the zone. (Yep, I did > that.) :) Having virtualized zones comes quite handy while hacking up new stuff to track VIMAGE memory leaks, but once the bugs get cleaned up and if the V_ stuff gets commited to head, it apparently becomes difficult to persuade people to de-virtualize... Marko