Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:05:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Alex Richardson <arichardson@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r365836 - head/share/mk Message-ID: <202009171705.08HH5CtE014644@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfqUZRPbbZRsEvVa_rdx0%2BYou9LVihatKZSTTdouaRzKWQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 9:39 AM Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu> wrote: > > > Alex Richardson wrote in > > <202009171507.08HF7Qns080555@repo.freebsd.org>: > > |Author: arichardson > > |Date: Thu Sep 17 15:07:25 2020 > > |New Revision: 365836 > > |URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/365836 > > | > > |Log: > > | Stop using lorder and ranlib when building libraries > > | > > | Use of ranlib or lorder is no longer necessary with current linkers > > | (probably anything newer than ~1990) and ar's ability to create an > > object > > | index and symbol table in the archive. > > | Currently the build system uses lorder+tsort to sort the .o files in > > | dependency order so that a single-pass linker can use them. However, > > | we can use the -s flag to ar to add an index to the .a file which makes > > | lorder unnecessary. > > | Running ar -s is equivalent to running ranlib afterwards, so we can > > also > > | skip the ranlib invocation. > > > > That ranlib thing yes (for long indeed), but i have vague memories > > that the tsort/lorder ordering was also meant to keep the things > > which heavily interdepend nearby each other. (Luckily Linux > > always had at least tsort available.) > > This no longer matters for all the platforms FreeBSD supports? > > > > tsort has no notion of how dependent the modules are, just an order that > allows a single pass through the .a file (otherwise you'd need to list the > .a file multiple times on the command line absent ranlib). That's the > original purpose of tsort. tsort, lsort, and ranlib all arrived in 7th > edition unix on a PDP-11, where size was more important than proximity to > locations (modulo overlays, which this doesn't affect at all). > > There were some issues of long vs short jumps on earlier architectures that > this helped (since you could only jump 16MB, for example). However, there > were workarounds for this issue on those platforms too. And if you have a > program that this does make a difference, then you can still use > tsort/lorder. They are still in the system. > > I doubt you could measure a difference here today. I doubt, honestly, that > anybody will notice at all. The x86 archicture has relative jmps of differning lengths, even in long mode there is support for rel8 and rel32. > > Warner -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202009171705.08HH5CtE014644>