Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:58:14 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: db@traceroute.dk Cc: ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory permissions Message-ID: <20021219235814.272182A7EA@canning.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200212182322.gBINMuhi019124@smtp020.tiscali.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
socketd wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > http://developer.intel.com/ > > > > Look for the SDM. > > ok, thanks :-) > > > > What are the alternatives to ia64? > > > > Stick with 32-bit. AMDs Hammer. Yet-another-64-bit-processor. > > NUMA/clustering externsions. I don't know... > > Stick with 32-bit? Can't stop progress and I'm looking forward to 64-bit > with the improved design and read AND execute permissions ;-) Well, a certain cpu manufacturer would like you to believe that 32 bits ought to be enough for anybody (except big iron servers) and that the true path forwards is hyperthreading in order to increase instructions-per-clock. > Thanks for your help! > > br > socketd > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message > Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021219235814.272182A7EA>