From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 19:59:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB739B2240 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:59:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric_badger@dell.com) Received: from aussmtpmrkps320.us.dell.com (aussmtpmrkps320.us.dell.com [143.166.224.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "ausxipmktps31.us.dell.com", Issuer "Verizon Public SureServer CA G14-SHA1" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F6931CF0; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric_badger@dell.com) X-Loopcount0: from 76.164.8.179 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,603,1432616400"; d="scan'208";a="309599958" Message-ID: <55BFC80B.2000005@dell.com> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:59:07 -0500 From: Eric Badger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Current CC: Subject: Appending to message buffer while in ddb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 19:59:16 -0000 Hi there, Since r226435, output from kernel printf/log functions is not appended to the message buffer when in ddb. The commit message doesn't call this out specifically; instead it appears to have been to address double printing to the console while in ddb. I noticed this because a ddb script which previously resulted in some things ending up in a textdump's msgbuf.txt no longer does so. It may be that the answer is "use db_printf in ddb", which is ok, but I thought I'd check anyway to see if the aforementioned change was indeed intentional, since I wasn't able to dig up any discussion about it. Thanks, Eric